Theological Censure

(Pastor’s Note from the Mary Immaculate of Lourdes Parish Bulletin for August 26, 2012)

In last Sunday’s bulletin note I presented the Catholic Church’s approach to dogma, which is to carefully make distinctions among different grades of theological certainty. Some things are to be believed with the certainty of faith, de fide, whereas other things are less theologically certain but are still part of Catholicism.

Another way to appreciate these distinctions is to contrast them with the theological censures, that is, the judgment that certain things are contrary to Catholic Faith and Morals or at least doubtful. Here follows a list of the theological censures:

  1. Heretical Proposition: false teaching, a proposition that is opposed to a formal dogma, e.g. God is not a Trinity of Persons is a heretical proposition.
  2. Proximate to Heresy: a proposition which goes against a truth which is proximate to the Catholic Faith, e.g. the belief that Jesus Christ did not actually sin, but also could not sin is a truth proximate to the Catholic Faith: to deny or question it would be a proposition “Proximate to Heresy”.
  3. Savoring or Suspect of Heresy.
  4. Erroneous Proposition: a proposition which contradicts a teaching proposed by the Church as intrinsically connected with Revealed Truth or opposed to the common teaching of theologians, e.g., a denial that Original Sin consists in the deprivation of grace caused by the free act of sin committed by the head of the human race is an erroneous proposition.
  5. False Proposition: contradiction of a dogmatic fact, e.g., that St. Peter established his episcopate in Rome is a dogmatic fact.
  6. Temerarious Proposition: deviation without reason from the general teaching of the Church.
  7. Offensive to Pious Ears: a proposition made which is offensive to religious feeling, even if not, strictly speaking, untrue.
  8. Proposition Badly Expressed (male sonans): a proposition subject to misunderstanding by reason of its method of expression.
  9. Captious Proposition: reprehensible because of its intentional ambiguity.
  10. Proposition Exciting Scandal.

(Source: Fundamentals of Catholicism, Dr. Ludwig Ott, Introduction, “Theological Grades of Certainty”, 4th edition, A.D. 1960)

In the life of the Church over the last few decades the faithful have been subjected to many things from individuals who can claim to have an official status within the Church, as priests, consecrated religious, professional pastoral ministers or theologians. They declare things which are quite deserving of one or more of the Theological Censures on this list. I know that I have heard and read things, particularly touching upon the humanity of Jesus and Mary, which should fall under the censures—at least—of “Offensive to Pious Ears”, “Badly Expressed”, “Captious” and “Exciting Scandal”.

It is no longer the practice for Church authority to publicly and formally impose censures, except in the most egregious cases. Pope John XIII set the tone for our times in the early 1960s when he said that the Church of today should prefer to use “the medicine of mercy” in place of her historical recourse to condemnations, the anathemas.

For our own protection, however, we need to allow our “sense of faith” to register both reserve and disapproval when we hear things asserted by an official or professional Catholic which strike us as unsound and not the “Faith of our Fathers”. The spirit of our age is particularly marked by flippancy, irreverence, and a reflexively oppositional attitude towards traditional morality. It is not surprising that we should find these things within the Household of Faith. Nevertheless, we have to push back against them for the sake of the integrity of our own faith-life.

Fr. Higgins
(Fr. Higgins)

Mary Immaculate of Lourdes Bulletin for August 19, 2012

Mary Immaculate of Lourdes Bulletin for the week of August 19, 2012

Bulletin: MaryImmaculate-2012-08-19.pdf

Front Cover:  Stained-glass window at the Cathedral of Chartres, France, which shows the scene of the Dormition (the “Falling Asleep”) of the Blessed Virgin Mary in Jerusalem, surrounded by the Apostles.  This end of her earthly life was followed by the miraculous Assumption of her body into Heaven, the feast-day celebrated by the Catholic Church on August 15th.

Pastor’s Note: Theological Certainty


Please visit the Mary Immaculate of Lourdes website and
facebook page for more information.

Mary Immaculate bulletins are available at www.maryimmaculatenewton.com.

Theological Certainty

(Pastor’s Note from the Mary Immaculate of Lourdes Parish Bulletin for August 19, 2012)

On Wednesday of this past week, August 15th, we celebrated the feast-day of the Assumption of the Blessed Virgin Mary into Heaven, body and soul.  Although belief in the Assumption of Mary had long been held in the Church, it was not until relatively recently that a Pope solemnly defined it with the certainty of faith.  This Solemn Definition took place on November 1st, 1950, in Rome when Pope Pius XII publicly proclaimed: “After frequently praying to God and invoking the light of the Spirit of truth, to the glory of Almighty God who enriched the Virgin Mary with special favor to the honor of her Son, the immortal
King of ages and victor over death and sin, to the increase of the glory of His august Mother, to the joy and exultation of the whole Church, by the authority of our Lord Jesus Christ and of the holy Apostles Peter and Paul and by Our own authority, We declare and define as a revealed dogma that the Immaculate Mary ever-Virgin, Mother of God, when she had finished the course of her earthly life, was taken up body and soul into the glory of heaven.”

The question may arise: well, if the Assumption of Mary was already believed in and observed as a liturgical feast-day, what exactly did the Solemn Definition of 1950 change?  The answer is: what changed was the theological grade of certainty.  The Assumption of Mary went from being a probable opinion, which it would have been “impious and blasphemous to deny” (Pope Benedict XIV), to a defined dogma of the Catholic Faith.

The Solemn Definition of the Assumption of Mary was an instance of the Infallible Teaching Office of the Church, the “Magisterium”, exercising its authority to vouch for the fact that a Truth is contained in God’s Divine Revelation.  When we give our free assent to it we reinforce our act of faith in the Catholic Church as a divine institution.

Not all the Catholic Truths are proposed for our belief with the same degree of theological certainty.  The highest degree or grade of theological certainty is accorded to those Truths which are “of FAITH”—de fide.  If its certainty is based on God’s Revelation it is “divine faith”: if its certainty is based on the Magisterium’s teaching that the Truth is part of Revelation it is “Catholic faith”.  Hence, the expression “of divine and Catholic faith”. Moreover if the Truth is defined by a solemn judgment of the Pope or of a General Council it is said to be of “defined faith”.  The Assumption of Mary into Heaven is just such a Truth.  We believe in it de fide.

Other grades of theological certainty include doctrines which the Magisterium of the Church has decided are to be accepted with a faith solely based on the authority of the Church—ecclesiastical faith.  The infallibility of the Church includes these doctrines as well as dogmas proper.

Then there are those doctrines considered as “Teachings proximate to the Faith”, regarded by theologians generally as truths of Revelation but not finally presented by the Church as such, or “Teachings pertaining to the Faith”, which again the Church has not pronounced on but their truth is guaranteed by their intrinsic connection with the doctrine of Revelation.

“Common Teaching” (sententia communis) is a doctrine which although in itself still in the field of free theological opinion is generally accepted by theologians as true. An example would be the belief that Mary underwent a bodily death (her “Dormition”) prior to her Assumption.

Other theological opinions of lesser grades of certainty are listed as “Probable”, “More Probable”, and “Well-founded”.  Those opinions which are in agreement with the consciousness of Catholic faith are categorized as “Pious Opinions” (sententia pia).  The phrase used for that is: “it may be piously believed…” An example of this was Pope John XXIII’s favorable endorsement of the bodily assumption of St. Joseph into Heaven as a pious belief.

The least degree of certainty is the Tolerated Opinion (opinio tolerata), which is only weakly founded but nonetheless tolerated by the Church.

It ought to be clear then that the Church’s Teaching Authority takes great care to distinguish between its grades of certainty so
that only the most important things, expressed in terse, precise formulas, are to be believed as de fide.  Catholic Truths are anything but a “Party line” or a stultifying list of fundamentalist, time-bound thought-controls.  The Living Magisterium of the Church allows plenty of room for the Holy Spirit to maneuver, while at the same time safeguarding against mistaking the “spirit of the age” for the promptings of the Holy Spirit of God.

Fr. Higgins
(Fr. Higgins)

(Source: Fundamentals of Catholicism, Dr. Ludwig Ott, Introduction, “Theological Grades of Certainty”, 4th edition, A.D. 1960)

Mary Immaculate of Lourdes Bulletin for August 12, 2012

Mary Immaculate of Lourdes Bulletin for the week of August 12, 2012

Bulletin: MaryImmaculate-2012-08-12.pdf

Front Cover:  “Vierge du Rosaire”—the Virgin of the Rosary—by Louis Brea, (1458-1523 A.D.)  The Feast of the Assumption, August 15th, which we celebrate this week, marks the beginning of the heavenly life of Mary.


Please visit the Mary Immaculate of Lourdes website and
facebook page for more information.

Mary Immaculate bulletins are available at www.maryimmaculatenewton.com.

Mary Immaculate of Lourdes Bulletin for August 5, 2012

Mary Immaculate of Lourdes Bulletin for the week of August 5, 2012

Bulletin: MaryImmaculate-2012-08-05.pdf

Front Cover:  The statue of Our Lady seen from the angle of the Children’s Garden, Mary Immaculate of Lourdes.  The white church birdhouse was a gift of Fred and Barbara Bowers.  Photo taken on July 22nd, 2012


Please visit the Mary Immaculate of Lourdes website and
facebook page for more information.

Mary Immaculate bulletins are available at www.maryimmaculatenewton.com.